1 Message
Base Station Battery Upgrade?
I recently pulled the batteries from my SS3 base station and see that they are 1000 mili amp hour, nickel metal hydride rechargables. Is there a problem with replacing them with a higher capacity cell for longer run time when the power goes out? Thanks!
sevensiamesecats
2.2K Messages
4 years ago
Best bet is to try it. And keep in mind that "no name" batteries which claim a high mah rating could be "exaggerating".
0
0
simplistuckon
248 Messages
4 years ago
A simpler solution for really long-running backup would be a small desktop Uninterrupted Power Supply (UPS). They run $40-50 for a 450 VA (250 Watt) unit. The power consumption of the base (SS2) is so low my Kill A Watt meter won't even register it. Safe bet that a little UPS will run it for a full day, if not several days.
I have my base in my home office, so it's plugged into my existing big 1400 VA UPS my computers are plugged into. Computers are usually going to be turned off in any power-out situation, so I'll get many, many days of power for my base station. :)
For any UPS, remember to put a significant load on it and simulate a power outage (pull the plug) for at least 5 minutes every 6-12 months. Almost all still use gel-cell lead-acid batteries that only last 3-5 years. They go "soft" (weak) without any obvious signs until a load is put on them.
0
0
davey_d
Community Admin
•
5.7K Messages
4 years ago
Yes, it's safe to replace those batteries with a higher capacity, so long as you use NiMH. It's just that the improvements are somewhat marginal, so it might not be worth it.
A UPS would certainly be a great option as well - so you'll have both the Base Station's batteries and the UPS to fall back on.
- Johnny M.
SimpliSafe Home Security
0
0
sevensiamesecats
2.2K Messages
4 years ago
Some modern UPS seem to have overcome this inefficiency. My UPSs have an "estimated time" available on the display, which claim they will power SS and my exterior DVR based cameras for a decent period of time. Not that I've ever tried it for that long, so I suppose it could be "over-estimating".
0
0